MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2766947607 · doi:10.21553/rev-jec.158

An Online Distributed Boundary Detection and Classification Algorithm for Mobile Sensor Networks

2017· article· en· W2766947607 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueREV Journal on Electronics and Communications · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicDistributed Control Multi-Agent Systems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Prince Edward Island
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBoundary (topology)Network topologyComputer scienceAlgorithmWireless sensor networkProcess (computing)Distributed algorithmSynchronization (alternating current)Topology (electrical circuits)MathematicsDistributed computingComputer network

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We present a novel online distributed boundary detection and classification algorithm in order to improve accuracy of boundary detection and classification for mobile sensor networks. This algorithm is developed by incorporating a boundary detection algorithm and our newly proposed boundary error correction algorithm. It is a fully distributed algorithm based on the geometric approach allowing to remove boundary errors without recursive process and global synchronization. Moreover, the algorithm allows mobile nodes to identify their states corresponding to their positions in network topologies, leading to self-classification of interior and exterior boundaries of network topologies. We have demonstrated effectiveness ofthis algorithm in both simulation and real-world experiments and proved that the accuracy of the ratio of correctly identified nodes over the total number of nodes is 100%.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Scholarly communication
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.990
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0030.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.304
Teacher spread0.277 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it