Effects of Notch Acuity on Fracture Toughness Measurements
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Effects of initial crack-tip acuity on toughness measurements has been evaluated through extensive small-scale toughness testing — single-edge notched tension and bend (SE(T) and SE(B)) — at room temperature using two X70 pipeline steels and girth welds. In order to investigate effects of different crack tip radii on toughness, some specimens were notched to the target initial crack size using electrical discharge machining (EDM), and no further fatigue precracking was made. On the other hand, other specimens were EDM-notched and then fatigue-precracked to the target crack size according to the current practice of ASTM E1820. The results show that effects of crack tip acuity on toughness measurement are significant especially at the crack-tip blunting stage. The EDM precrack increased toughness measurements by a factor of up to 1.6 and 2 for SE(B) and SE(T), respectively, at 0.2 mm of crack extension, compared to the fatigue precrack.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".