MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2766980646 · doi:10.1109/autest.2017.8080505

Built-in-test for integrating analog-to-digital converters that utilize a phase-sensitive detector

2017· article· en· W2766980646 on OpenAlexaff
Vadim Geurkov

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicElectrical and Bioimpedance Tomography
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceConvertersDetectorAnalog deviceElectronic engineeringAnalogue electronicsRedundancy (engineering)Digital electronicsComputer hardwareAnalog multiplierElectronic circuitAnalog signalDigital signal processingEngineeringElectrical engineeringVoltage

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Integrating analog-to-digital converters that utilize a phase-sensitive detector (PSADCs) are frequently used in high precision instrumentation and measurement systems. As any technical object, a PSADC is subject to faults. These faults must be detected promptly and accurately by built-in low complexity hardware. In the present work, this objective is achieved by the adoption of error-control codes. Off-line and on-line test methods are explored. We demonstrate how to perform compaction in digital and analog domains. We design a compactor of analog signals on the basis of a PSADC and explain how to utilize coding redundancy for on-line testing. We also explain how to use a PSADC for generating multiple residues which can further be processed by a computing device operating in a residue number system (RNS). Compared to existing techniques, the proposed approach is characterized by higher accuracy and lower latency. The proposed device can be used for analog circuits testing in much the same way as a conventional signature analyzer is used for digital circuits testing. The test process involves measuring signatures of analog signals, which ultimately appear in digital form. The signatures are then verified to make a pass/fail decision.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.272
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicElectrical and Bioimpedance TomographyFrench-language works237,207