MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2767039179 · doi:10.15402/esj.v1i1.236

Dorothy Day: Love in Action by Patrick Jordan. Collegeville, USA: Liturgical Press, 2015. 132 pp. ISBN: 978-0-8146-3703-6

2017· article· en· W2767039179 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Gertrude Rompré

Bibliographic record

VenueEngaged Scholar Journal Community-Engaged Research Teaching and Learning · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicReligious Studies and Spiritual Practices
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArtTheologyAction (physics)Ancient historyHistoryPhilosophyPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Prophets, by definition, make us uncomfortable.Their acute insight into the pitfalls of human society, and their incessant clarion calls to justice, make us squirm in our comfortable pews.Dorothy Day (1897Day ( -1980)), the prickly American prophetess who, along with Peter Maurin, founded the Catholic Worker movement, elicited, for many, this experience of prophetic discomfort.It is into this uneasy space that

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.566
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.373
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Meta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Research integrity
Consensus categoriesMetaresearch
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.564
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.5660.373
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.4880.001
Scholarly communication0.0090.003
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.564
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.179
GPT teacher head0.393
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEngaged Scholar Journal Community-Engaged Research Teaching and LearningSame topicReligious Studies and Spiritual PracticesFrench-language works237,207