Patient and worker safety in imaging: an integrative review Segurança do paciente e do trabalhador em Imagenologia: uma revisão integrativa
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objetivo: Levantar as publicações científicas acerca dos enfoques dados as Políticas Nacional de Segurança do paciente (PNSP) e de Saúde e Segurança Trabalhador (PNSST) a fim de integrar estas observações ao cuidado em saúde. Método: estudo quali-quantitativo em revisão sistemática integrada e os dados foram obtidos e registrados através de gráficos, tabelas e quadros além da base teórica do cuidado de Florence. Resultado: O estudo constatou que cerca de 12,8% dos artigos são voltados para essa temática. Dentro dessa temática, o setor que mais se destaca é a hemodiálise. A teoria ambientalista de Florence junto com a temática proposta influencia tanto na segurança do trabalhador quanto na segurança do paciente. Conclusão: Os artigos de segurança do trabalhador, segurança do paciente e imagenologia estão intrinsecamente associados. E, dessa maneira, podem ter mais artigos posteriormente incluindo essa temática entrelaçada.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.008 | 0.022 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.008 | 0.006 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".