Biaya Promosi dan Penghimpunan Dana Pihak Ketiga Pada Bank Pembiayaan Rakyat Syariah
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The aim of this study is to analyze whether there is influence the expense of promotion is issued to against amount of third party assembled by BPRS. In addition, to analyze the variable lag time (lag) cost of promotion that the most effective effect on changes in third party funds obtained by BPRS. This study used regression analysis or AutoRegressive Distributed Lag (ARDL). The variables used are promotion cost as independent variable and third party fund as dependent variable. The result of this study showed that the amount of promotion cost has a positive and significant influence on the increasing amount of third party funds of BPRS, as explained by the results of ARDL analysis conducted by the author, that is change in third party funds affected by third party funds one quarter earlier and influenced by the amount of promotional costs the previous quarter or 15 months earlier. This indicates that the higher the promotion expense of budget, the BPRS will be able to collect more third party funds.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it