MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2767077722 · doi:10.1016/j.nicl.2018.03.007

Development and validation of a novel dementia of Alzheimer's type (DAT) score based on metabolism FDG-PET imaging

2018· preprint· en· W2767077722 on OpenAlexafffund
Karteek Popuri, Rakesh Balachandar, Kathryn Alpert, Donghuan Lu, Mahadev Bhalla, Ian R. Mackenzie, Lei Wang, Mirza Faisal Beg

Bibliographic record

VenueNeuroImage Clinical · 2018
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British ColumbiaSimon Fraser University
FundersJohnson and Johnson Pharmaceutical Research and DevelopmentNational Institute on AgingNational Institute of Biomedical Imaging and BioengineeringCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchNational Institutes of HealthGenentechIXICOServierU.S. Department of DefenseEli Lilly and CompanyLundbeckfondenMichael Smith Health Research BCAlzheimer's AssociationFujirebio USJanssen Alzheimer Immunotherapy Research And DevelopmentAbbVieFondation Brain CanadaDoD Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging InitiativeNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaPfizerBiogenBioClinicaTakeda Pharmaceuticals U.S.A.Novartis Pharmaceuticals CorporationBristol-Myers SquibbRocheMerckAlzheimer's Drug Discovery FoundationGE HealthcareAlzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging InitiativeMeso Scale Diagnostics
KeywordsPositron emission tomographyNeuroimagingDementiaBiomarkerFluorodeoxyglucoseImaging biomarkerMedicineInternal medicineNuclear medicinePsychologyArtificial intelligenceOncologyDiseaseRadiologyMagnetic resonance imagingNeuroscienceComputer scienceChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

=2984) obtained from the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) database taken across the proposed stratification, and a good classification AUC (area under the curve) of 0.78 was achieved in distinguishing between images belonging to subjects on a DAT trajectory and those images taken from subjects not progressing to a DAT diagnosis. Further, the FPDS biomarker achieved state-of-the-art performance on the mild cognitive impairment (MCI) to DAT conversion prediction task with an AUC of 0.81, 0.80, 0.77 for the 2, 3, 5 years to conversion windows respectively.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.063
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.155
GPT teacher head0.425
Teacher spread0.270 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNeuroImage ClinicalSame topicDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchFrench-language works237,207