Médiations alimentaires et écologie de l’attention à l’Exposition universelle de Milan, 2015
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Dans le cadre de l’exposition universelle de Milan de 2015 dont le thème était « Nourrir la planète, énergie pour la vie », plusieurs pays, organisations non gouvernementales et entreprises ont profité de l’occasion pour mettre en valeur leurs produits, leurs spécialités, leurs cultures gastronomiques et leurs initiatives en développement durable. Cet article explore comment le contexte de l’exposition universelle, en tant qu’événement international, affecte les modes de valorisation des patrimoines et des cultures alimentaires, dans une situation de concurrence pour l’attention d’un public massif. Ainsi, paradoxalement, autant les promoteurs du Slow Food devaient accélérer leurs services pour répondre aux besoins de la clientèle, les entreprises de « fast food » devaient, à l’occasion de l’Exposition, mettre de l’avant les atouts qualitatifs de leurs produits plutôt que l’efficacité. L’article examine donc plus généralement quels peuvent être les effets d’une mondialisation intensive sur les pratiques de médiation alimentaire pour un public submergé d’informations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.011 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.011 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".