Investigation on Casing Damage in Liaohe Du66 Combustion Project
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The dry In-situ combustion test was conducted for multilayer heavy oil reservoir such as Du66 in Liaohe Oilfield since 2005, in consideration of the limited oil recovery of cyclic steam stimulation for such multilayer heavy oil reservoir with more than 10 layers and the thickness ranging from 1m to 15m. There are more than 90 CSS wells converted into air injection wells operated in geometric well pattern in past 10 years. Field well integrity testing result shows that casing damage such as diameter shrinkage, corrosion, and local destroy, are found in about a fifth of the air injection wells. The casing damage has become one of the largest problems in the in-situ combustion project, and remedial well treatments have to be carried out urgently. It will negatively affect the development performance and also indeed a risky operation under high temperature, backfire and even explosive conditions. In order to effectively prevent the casing damage in air injection process, casing damage in Du 66 project is investigated at first, then performance of field measured temperature and air injection were primarily analyzed combined with numerical simulation of a typical reservoir recovered by an air injection well group. Based on extensive laboratory experiments, temperature and oxidation corrosion on yield strength of different material casing are investigated, furthermore, principles of casing damage in Du66 project are discussed. At last, preventive measures for Du66 combustion project are investigated. The results show that the causes of casing damage in Du66 project involve reduction of casing intensity because of high temperature and corrosion, and stress variation because of large temperature difference between layers, especially local extra high temperature occurring at layer(s) with low air injectivity where burning in the vicinity of wellbore will keep on for a long time. Consequently, downhole electrical ignition other than chemical ignition and self ignition is recommended for its uniformly heating advantage, and separated-zone combustion in sequence, selective separate zone combustion and air conformance control methods are effective to prevent casing damage of such multilayer reservoir as Du66.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".