Priority-Based Microgrid Energy Management in a Network Environment
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The paper presents a method for energy storage dispatch and sharing of renewable energy resources in a network of grid-connected microgrids. The proposed scheme provides for local inter-microgrid and microgrid-to-grid power transactions, enabling them to collectively share their storage and renewable energy capacity in order to reduce their electricity cost. The storage dispatch commands and the share of local and grid power transactions for the individual microgrids are determined by solving a multi-objective optimization problem over a receding control horizon, using forecasts of the net power demands of the microgrids. This multi-objective optimization is formulated as a lexicographic program, to allow for preferential treatment of groups of microgrids based on pre-assigned priorities. The original optimization model is convex but nonlinear. A linear counterpart of the problem is derived that is suitable for online computation. Numerical simulations with real demand and renewable generation data demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed strategy in reducing the electricity costs of the microgrids in accordance to their priority in the network.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it