SQUEEZE : représentations du baseball dans l'imaginaire social au Québec : 1994-2014
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Le baseball occupe une place atypique dans les discours publics au Québec. Ses multiples représentations, teintées d’une exubérante ferveur ou d’un désintérêt des plus opiniâtres, l’attestent sans équivoque. Outre l’unicité de la langue française (qui est déjà beaucoup en soi), on se doute que des particularismes québécois existent et qu’ils prennent forme dans les diverses manifestations culturelles écrites, chantées, dessinées ou publicisées de ce sport. Le baseball a influencé les cultures savante et populaire d’ici et il continue à faire couler de l’encre, à pénétrer et à structurer des discours de natures diverses et à marquer l’imaginaire et l’imagination. Il s’agit dans la présente recherche d’arriver à une lecture spécifiquement québécoise des représentations du baseball dans l’imaginaire (social, collectif et culturel) entre 1994 et 2014, grâce à l’examen de quatre thématiques principales, soit l’écriture, l’espace, le temps et la sexualité.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.015 | 0.007 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.019 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".