MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2767211069 · doi:10.5070/g311310403

The Human Impact on the Natural Environment (5th ed.) The Human Impact Reader: Readings and Case Studies

2000· article· en· W2767211069 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueElectronic Green Journal · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicClimate Change and Environmental Impact
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEnvironmental ethicsNatural (archaeology)HistorySociologyPhilosophyArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Review: The Human Impact on the Natural Environment (5th ed.) Review: The Human Impact Reader: Readings and Case Studies By Andrew Goudie Reviewed by Thomas Fletcher Bishop’s University, Canada Goudie, Andrew. The Human Impact on the Natural Environment (5th ed.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2000. 511 pp. ISBN 0-262-57138-2 (paperback). US$29.95 Goudie, Andrew (Ed.). The Human Impact Reader: Readings and Case Studies. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishers, 1997. 472 pp. ISBN 0-631-19981 (paperback). US$33.95 Andrew Goudie's acclaimed geography textbook, The Human Impact on the Natural Environment, now in its fifth edition, is as relevant as ever to social and scientific aspects of ecology. It is best read in conjunction with his edited volume of articles reprinted from scientific journals, The Human Impact Reader. Both are aimed at upper-level undergraduates and informed readers who want to enrich their knowledge of physical geography as modified by human action, to borrow a phrase from George Perkins Marsh (1864) whose legacy Goudie draws on extensively. The textbook begins with an historical account of how cultural adaptations to technological changes have influenced, and generally intensified, environmental impacts (i.e., I=PAT). It proceeds with separate chapters on human effects on vegetation, animals, soil, water, geomorphology, climate, and atmosphere. The reader follows roughly the same organization in its sections, each of which begins with an introduction to relevant literature. Goudie's textbook has changed little since its first publication in 1981, but he has updated it periodically to reflect recent literature and current issues. The fifth edition is particularly welcome in this regard given the rapid pace of recent research, especially on climate change. Since Rio and Kyoto, it has mushroomed along with public interest and funding, and Goudie does an excellent job documenting and explaining this. Both books demonstrate, somewhat ironically, that the problem of scientific uncertainty is ever present, particularly on this issue: No completely acceptable explanation of climatic change has ever been presented, and no one process acting alone can explain all scales of climate change. The complexity of possibly causative factors is daunting (Goudie

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.560
Threshold uncertainty score0.997

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0040.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.309
Teacher spread0.286 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it