The Osteogenic Differentiation of Mice Bone Marrow Mesenchymal Stem Cells with Fisetin Phytoestrogen
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objective(s): The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of fisetin to promote osteogenic differentiation in mice bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells (BMSCs).Materials and Methods: In this study cytotoxicity and viability of fisetin was measured by MTT assay. The differentiation effects of fisetin on BMSCs into osteoblast was assessed with alkaline phosphatase (ALP) activity measurement. Alizarin red staining and Real time PCR for osteoblast specific marker, Osteocalcin (OCN) ,Osteopontin (OPN), Runt-related transcription factor 2 (RUNX2), ERK and MAPK were investigatedResults: The results showed that fisetin does not have toxicity effect on BMSCs and it causes cell proliferation; hence 200, 400 and 800 µg/ml of fisetin was selected for the assessment of differentiation progress. Alizarin red staining (ARS) showed that fisetin promotes osteogenic differentiation on BMSCs at 21st day; dependently also higher alkaline phosphates activity was observed in the treatment groups of 10 days culture, compared to the control groups. The evaluation of Real time -PCR result evaluated showed that OCN OPN, RUNX2,ERK and MAPK genes expressions were increased.Conclusion: The results of this method, showed that differentiation in bone marrow stem cells took place through p38 MAPK, and ERK1 gene activation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".