MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2767254683 · doi:10.22374/cjgim.v12i3.168

A Rare Presentation of Eosinophilic Granulomatosis with Polyangiitis with Diffuse Lymphadenopathy

2017· article· en· W2767254683 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Sean O’Loghlen, Joshua Lakoff, John Garvey, David Good, Marie Clements‐Baker

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of General Internal Medicine · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicEosinophilic Disorders and Syndromes
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineGranulomatosis with polyangiitisEosinophilicPresentation (obstetrics)DermatologyPathologyVasculitisRadiologyDisease

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A 56-year-old man, who recently returned from a trip to Guyana, presented to hospital with a 10-week history of neuropathic pain, paresthesias, sinus pain, weight loss, and diffuse lymphadenopathy. Bloodwork was remarkable for significant eosinophilia (6.57 ×109 cells/L), erythrocyte sedimentation rate of 119 mm/hour and C-reactive protein of 44.3 mg/L. An extensive work up for an underlying lymphoproliferative disorder or infectious process was negative. Anti-MPO ANCA was initially borderline positive at 23 CU but on repeat testing 3 months later was strongly positive at 409 CU. He was diagnosed with eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis (EGPA) and was started on corticosteroids with an excellent clinical response. We review the epidemiology, typical clinical manifestations, diagnostic criteria and management of EGPA.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.260
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of General Internal MedicineSame topicEosinophilic Disorders and SyndromesFrench-language works237,207