MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2767283119 · doi:10.4000/books.pum.4276

Construction sociale des technologies

2015· book-chapter· fr· W2767283119 on OpenAlexafffund
Pierre Doray

Bibliographic record

VenuePresses de l’Université de Montréal eBooks · 2015
Typebook-chapter
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicInformation Systems Theories and Implementation
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Montréal
FundersUniversity of Illinois at Urbana-ChampaignOrganisation de Coopération et de Développement ÉconomiquesUniversity of TorontoJohns Hopkins UniversityPrinceton UniversityUniversity of OxfordHarvard UniversityUniversity of CambridgeWayne State UniversityState University of New YorkStanford Bio-XStyrelsen för Internationellt Utvecklingssamarbete
KeywordsSociologyGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Pinch et Bijker s’inscrivent de plain-pied dans le changement de paradigme qui a posé comme objet principal la production sociale des technologies plutôt que l’analyse des impacts sociaux des technologies (voir Technologie et Déterminisme technologique). Ils ont proposé dès 1982, à l’occasion d’un colloque à l’Université Twente, l’approche SCOT (pour Social Construction of Technology ou « construction sociale des technologies ») dans l’esprit d’un rapprochement avec l’approche dite EPOR (pour...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.751
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2015
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePresses de l’Université de Montréal eBooksSame topicInformation Systems Theories and ImplementationFrench-language works237,207