Profiling Energy Efficiency and Data Communications for Mobile Internet of Things
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper proposes a novel power management solution for resource-constrained devices in the context of Internet of Things (IoT). We focus on smartphones in the IoT, as they are getting increasingly popular and equipped with strong sensing capabilities. Smartphones have complex and asynchronous power consumption incurred by heterogeneous components including their on-board sensors. Their interaction with the cloud allows them to offload computation tasks and access remote data storage. In this work, we aim at monitoring the power consumption behaviours of the smartphones, profiling both individual applications and the system as a whole, to make better decisions in power management. We design a cloud orchestration architecture as an epic predictor of behaviours of smart devices by extracting their application characteristics and resource utilization. We design and implement this architecture to perform energy profiling and data analysis on massive data logs. This cloud orchestration architecture coordinates a number of cloud-based services and supports dynamic workflows between service components, which can reduce energy consumption in the energy profiling process itself. Experimental results showed that small portion of applications dominate the energy consumption of smartphones. Heuristic profiling can effectively reduce energy consumption in data logging and communications without scarifying the accuracy of power monitoring.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it