MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2767308440 · doi:10.28984/drhj.v1i0.13

The Meaning of Home for Aging Women Living Alone in North Eastern Ontario

2017· article· en· W2767308440 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Arro Barry, Roberta Heale, Anne Marise Lavoie, Roger Pilon

Bibliographic record

VenueDiversity of Research in Health Journal · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicMigration, Aging, and Tourism Studies
Canadian institutionsLaurentian University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMeaning (existential)Vulnerability (computing)Aging in placeGerontologyPreferencePsychologyMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The experience and meaning of home for older, community dwelling women, who live alone was investigated. With the older demographic expanding and resources being directed at keeping older adults in their home, an expanded knowledge base is required. Interviews were conducted with seven home dwelling older women. Semi structured questions targeted the meaning of home for the participants. The theme of precariousness dominated the findings, including precariousness of formal and informal care, precariousness of winter and that home is not precarious. The study confirms that home is the preferred location for aging women. Health policy and services should continue to be implemented to accommodate this preference. Future research is needed to confirm the findings with a larger sample, incorporating additional life circumstances and to investigate the impact of factors such as winter weather and financial vulnerability on women’s ability to remain at home as they age.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.402
Threshold uncertainty score0.810

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0090.006
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.162
GPT teacher head0.417
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2017
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDiversity of Research in Health JournalSame topicMigration, Aging, and Tourism StudiesFrench-language works237,207