MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2767309224 · doi:10.1093/neuonc/nox168.1125

SCDT-45. ANTIBODY-BASED PET IMAGING OF BRAIN CANCER CELLS INFILTRATION

2017· article· en· W2767309224 on OpenAlexaff
Gabriel Charest, Otman Sarrhini, David Fortin, Danica Stanimirovic, Reinhard Gabathuler, Brigitte Guérin

Bibliographic record

VenueNeuro-Oncology · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCancer Research and Treatments
Canadian institutionsNational Research Council CanadaUniversité de Sherbrooke
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAntibodyBlood–brain barrierTranscytosisParenchymaCancer researchInfiltration (HVAC)PathologyMedicineImmunologyCentral nervous systemReceptorInternal medicineEndocytosis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Infiltrated glioblastoma (GBM) cells into the brain parenchyma cause recurrences after tumor resection and there is presently no efficient non-invasive method to detect these infiltrated cells. One obstacle is the blood-brain barrier (BBB), which limits the passage of specific radiolabeled antibodies targeting infiltrated cells to the central nervous system, preventing imaging by positron emission tomography (PET). We hereby aimed to conceive bi-specific radiolabeled antibodies acting in two chronological steps: 1- targeting a transporter to allow receptor-mediated transcytosis through the BBB and 2- targeting a specific biomarker of GBM cells for a specific retention and imaging. We will present the first part of the project consisting to demonstrate that the mono-specific radiolabeled antibody targeting BBB-transporter can actively cross the BBB of healthy rat following injection in the right external carotid artery. This method allows for high tracer concentration in the right hemisphere after first passage following the injection. Comparing the specific radiolabeled antibody to a non-specific antibody, we observe that only the BBB-transmigrating antibody is momentary retained at the BBB and then returns in the blood circulation. We will next assess whether this transitory uptake to the BBB is sufficient to let the bi-specific antibody reaches and link a specific antigen present on the migrating GBM cells. This study demonstrates that our radiolabeled antibody allows for a transitory and specific uptake to the BBB. These successful results are promising for the use of bi-specific radiolabeled antibody targeting infiltrated GBM cells thus should enabling for specific PET imaging.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.369
Teacher spread0.351 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNeuro-OncologySame topicCancer Research and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207