Bibliographic record
Abstract
[149-57-5] C8H16O2 (MW 144.21) InChI = InChI=1S/C8H16O2/c1-3-5-6-7(4-2)8(9)10/h7H,3-6H2,1-2H3,(H,9,10) InChIKey = OBETXYAYXDNJHR-UHFFFAOYSA-N (S)-(+)-enantiomer [[72377-05-0]] C8H16O2 (MW 144.21) InChI = InChI=1S/C8H16O2/c1-3-5-6-7(4-2)8(9)10/h7H,3-6H2,1-2H3,(H,9,10)/t7-/m0/s1 InChIKey = OBETXYAYXDNJHR-ZETCQYMHSA-N (R)-(–)-enantiomer [56006-48-5] C8H16O2 (MW 144.21) InChI = InChI=1S/C8H16O2/c1-3-5-6-7(4-2)8(9)10/h7H,3-6H2,1-2H3,(H,9,10)/t7-/m1/s1 InChIKey = OBETXYAYXDNJHR-SSDOTTSWSA-N (reagent used as a soluble organic acid) Alternate Name: EHA, 2-ethylcaproic acid. Physical Data: bp 228 °C;1 [α]d25 + 10.0° (acetone, c 1.30);2 [α]d18 + 10.5° (CHCl3, c 0.88);3 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 2.28 (tt, J = 8.5, 5.5 Hz, 1H), 1.72–1.42 (m, 4H), 1.39–1.21 (m, 4H), 1.00–0.82 (m, 6H); 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 183.06, 77.16, 47.23, 31.60, 29.66, 25.32, 22.78, 14.06, 11.90.4 Solubility: soluble in most common organic solvents (including hexanes and heptane), partially soluble in water.5 Form Supplied in: as a colorless liquid; commercially available. Purification: 2-ethylhexanoic acid may be distilled under reduced pressure6 or purified using an anion exchange resin.4 Preparative Methods: enantiomerically pure (S)-(+)- or (R)-(−)-2-ethylhexanoic acid may be prepared by resolution of diastereomeric derivatives,7, 8 enantioselective hydrogenation of α,β-unsaturated carboxylic acid,3, 9-11 asymmetric Favorskii rearrangement,12 enantioselective alkylation of the corresponding acylated pseudoephedrine derivative,2, 13 and enzymatic resolution.14, 15 Handling, Storage, and Precautions: air and moisture stable.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.043 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".