MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2767332368 · doi:10.2118/188184-ms

Saving Rig Time by the Use of New Generation Ultrasonic Transducers to Evaluate Cement in Outer Casing through Section Milled Window of the Inner Casing

2017· article· en· W2767332368 on OpenAlexaff
Lilia Noble, Amit Govil, C. McCann, Guillermo Andres Obando Palacio, O. Knutsen, Bendik Nesland, Dan Mueller

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicDrilling and Well Engineering
Canadian institutionsConocoPhillips (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCasingSeal (emblem)Petroleum engineeringCementSpark plugInflowDrillingGeologyGeotechnical engineeringEngineeringMaterials scienceMechanical engineeringComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract As the fields in the North Sea mature, many of wells undergo permanent well abandonment or permanent abandonment of a section of the well for consequent well sidetracking. Compliant procedures for well abandonment as per Norwegian Continental Shelf regulatory requirements necessitates the presence of double barriers to isolate permeable formations/sources of inflow. To achieve a compliant plug-and-abandonment case in situations where casing cement is part of the primary or secondary well barrier (forming part of an external well barrier envelope), casing cement must be verified by logging to ensure a good formation-to-cement-to-casing seal. However, if inner casing is expected to be cemented across the depth where the permanent cement plug (forming an internal well barrier element, WBE) is planned to be set, then the inner casing must be milled so that the outer casing can be logged to verify the barrier seal. Traditional casing milling operations are costly and time consuming, often lasting for several days. This paper describes an alternative way of verifying an external WBE when the inner casing presents an obstruction for outer casing cement evaluation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.048
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicDrilling and Well EngineeringFrench-language works237,207