MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2767340938 · doi:10.1111/rssa.12316

Corrigendum: Florence Nightingale, Statistics and the Crimean War

2017· erratum· en· W2767340938 on OpenAlexaff
Lynn McDonald

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A (Statistics in Society) · 2017
Typeerratum
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHistory of Science and Medicine
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHistoryClassicsStatisticsMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

[J. R. Statist. Soc. A, 177 (2014), 569–586] Some of the column headings in Table 1 on page 578 are incorrect. Table 1 should read as follows. Crimean War death rates by hospital† From Nightingale (1859b), page 25. Mean of weekly numbers remaining in hospital. Mean of admissions and discharges, including deaths. Crimean War death rates by hospital† From Nightingale (1859b), page 25. Mean of weekly numbers remaining in hospital. Mean of admissions and discharges, including deaths.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.009
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.147
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Editorial · Consensus signal: Editorial
Teacher disagreement score0.089
Threshold uncertainty score0.177

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0090.147
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0040.002
Bibliometrics0.0080.005
Science and technology studies0.0060.005
Scholarly communication0.0080.004
Open science0.0040.003
Research integrity0.0150.018
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0390.034

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.257
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEditorial

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A (Statistics in Society)Same topicHistory of Science and MedicineFrench-language works237,207