MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2767365295 · doi:10.2118/188398-ms

Monitoring of Greenhouse Gas Emissions From Space in the Middle East

2017· article· en· W2767365295 on OpenAlexaff
Jean‐François Gauthier, Stéphane Germain

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAtmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics
Canadian institutionsGHGSat (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGreenhouse gasMethaneSatelliteEnvironmental scienceFossil fuelCarbon dioxideFugitive emissionsHigh resolutionRemote sensingMeteorologyWaste managementEngineeringGeographyAerospace engineeringGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract In June 2016, GHGSat launched the world's first satellite capable of measuring greenhouse gas emissions from targeted industrial facilities around the world. We offer a single solution to measure emission rates of carbon dioxide and methane from selected targets with greater precision and lower cost than ground-based alternatives, across a wide range of industries. GHGSat is deriving the emission rates of these sources from 12 × 12 km maps of the atmospheric column densities of carbon dioxide and methane produced using its patented sensor at a spatial resolution better than 50 m. Satellite mass is less than 15 kg. Our solution provides industrial site operators and government regulators with the information they need to understand and manage their greenhouse gas emissions better and ultimately to reduce them more economically. We will describe the system, including the sensor and satellite specifications. We will also describe our products and services, show how they apply to the oil and gas industry in the Middle East and provide examples of various levels of imagery taken from the region with our satellite.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.021
Threshold uncertainty score0.042

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAtmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics→French-language works237,207→