Hydrolytic stability of polylactide and poly(methyl methacrylate) blends
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT The hydrolytic stability of polylactide/poly(methyl methacrylate) (PLA/PMMA) blends prepared using a twin‐screw extrusion process was investigated. The effects of hydrolysis were monitored in neutral and alkaline media at 80 °C by tracking the changes in molecular weight distribution, weight loss, water uptake, and crystallization behavior. The crystallinity of PLA in blends prior to hydrolysis was shown to be largely hindered by the presence of PMMA. However, PLA recrystallized rapidly during hydrolysis. The PMMA in the blends was shown to provide increased hydrolytic and structural stability to the blends. In the neutral medium, the presence of PMMA delayed and reduced the weight loss but did not significantly affect PLA degradation kinetics. On the other hand, in the alkaline medium, the weight loss rate was strongly decreased in presence of PMMA and the kinetics of degradation was shown to be depend on PMMA content. The microstructure of these blends throughout the hydrolysis process was also examined by scanning electron microscopy. A porous structure, with interconnected pores in the 20–50 nm range, was developed due to the selective removal of PLA. Based on these morphological observations, erosion mechanism of PLA/PMMA blends was discussed. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2018 , 135 , 45991.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".