MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

DANOS CAUSADOS PELA LARVA-ALFINETE EM MILHO EM CONDIÇÕES DE CAMPO

2017· article· pt· W2767384942 on OpenAlexaff
Ana Paula S Afonso-Rosa, L. B. Medina, LETICIA HELL WIG, Calisc de Oliveira Trecha, Marcus Vinícius Fipke

Bibliographic record

VenueRevista Brasileira de Milho e Sorgo · 2017
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicInsect Pest Control Strategies
Canadian institutionsMonsanto (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsHorticultureGrain yieldBiologyHumanitiesArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

RESUMO - O objetivo desse trabalho foi avaliar os danos causados por diferentes densidades larvais de Diabrotica speciosa em milho BG 7060 H em condições de campo. O experimento foi realizado na safra 2012/2013, na Embrapa Clima Temperado (S 31°49.268 e W 52°27.472). Cada parcela foi constituída de seis linhas de 5 m x 0,70 m. As plantas foram infestadas com 0, 5, 15, 30 e 40 larvas/planta. Foram avaliados, 64 dias após a infestação, o peso e o comprimento e dano em raízes e, na ocasião da colheita, a altura da planta e inserção da espiga e o rendimento. Não foi observada redução significativa do peso de raízes infestadas com larvas de D. speciosa. O comprimento das raízes foi numericamente maior quando não houve infestação larval, e a altura de plantas e a inserção da espiga não foram influenciadas pela infestação. De acordo com a escala de Iowa State 1-6, independentemente do número de larvas inoculadas às raízes, os danos foram abaixo de 2,0 (1,29 - 1,74). Pela escala de Iowa 0-3, verificou-se dano inferior a 0,75 (0,23 - 0,60). Em relação ao rendimento, de modo geral, à medida que aumentou a densidade larval, houve redução no rendimento.Palavras-chave: Diabrotica speciosa, injúrias, infestação artificial, raízes.DAMAGE CAUSED BY CORN ROOTWORM IN CORN FIELD CONDITIONSABSTRACT - The aim of this study was to evaluate the damage caused by different larval densities of Diabrotica speciosa in maize BG 7060 H under field conditions. The experiment was conducted in the field in 2012/2013, at Embrapa Clima Temperado (31°S 52°W 49,268 and 27,472). Each plot consisted of six rows 5 m x 0.70 m and the cultivar used was BG 7060 H. The plants were infested with 5, 15, 30 and 40 larvae/plant, and there was a control (no larvae). The damage, weight and length of roots were evaluated 64 days after infestation (DAI) (22/01/2013). At the harvest, plant and ear height and yield were evaluated. No significant reduction in the weight of roots infested with larvae of beetles was observed. The root length was numerically higher when there was no larval infestation. Plant and ear height was not affected by the infestation. According to Iowa State 1-6 damage scale, regardless of of the number of larvae inoculated to roots, damages were below 2.0 (1.29 to 1.74). According to scale of Iowa 0-3, there was damage less to 0.75 (0.23 to 0.60). In relation to yield, it was observed that, in general, as increased larval density, there was a reduction in yield.Keywords: Diabrotica speciosa, injuries, artificial infestation, roots.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.290
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.001
Open science0.0030.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.276
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevista Brasileira de Milho e SorgoSame topicInsect Pest Control StrategiesFrench-language works237,207