MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Results of a Phase 2 Trial Evaluating Efficacy and Safety of Entospletinib (GS-9973) in Patients with Mantle Cell Lymphoma

2016· article· en· W2767413682 on OpenAlexaff
Jeffrey P. Sharman, Kathryn S. Kolibaba, Andrei R. Shustov, Thomas A. Giever, Leonard M. Klein, Derek Nay, Thomas A. Rado, Alfred Saleh, Danjie Zhang, Wen Shi, Andres Forero, Sarit Assouline

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicChronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Research
Canadian institutionsJewish General HospitalRoyal Victoria Regional Health Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineMantle cell lymphomaBendamustineInternal medicineIbrutinibIdelalisibTolerabilityGastroenterologyAdverse effectOncologySurgeryRituximabChronic lymphocytic leukemiaLymphomaLeukemia

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Introduction: Entospletinib (GS-9973) is an orally bioavailable, selective inhibitor of spleen tyrosine kinase (Syk). Syk is a mediator of B-cell receptor signaling in normal and transformed B-cells. Targeting the B-cell receptor (BCR)-signaling pathway has been the focus in many types of B-cell related hematological malignancies including mantle cell lymphoma (MCL). Methods: This reports the MCL cohort in a phase 2 trial that more broadly evaluated the efficacy and safety of entospletinib (800 mg BID) in patients with relapsed and refractory hematological malignancies (NCT01799889). Tumor response was assessed per Cheson 2007 criteria with imaging planned at weeks 8, 16, 24, and then every 12 weeks. The primary endpoint was PFS at week 16. All efficacy data were assessed by an Independent Review Committee. Results: A cohort of 39 patients with MCL was enrolled. The median age was 72 years (range: 49-92), 64% were male, and a median number of prior regimens were 2 (range: 1-6). Prior therapy included anti-CD20 antibodies (95%), alkylating agents (95%; bendamustine 44%), and anthracyclines (77%). Three patients (8%) have received ibrutinib either as investigational drug (n = 1) or as an approved drug (n = 2), and 1 patient (3%) received idelalisib. Median duration of treatment was 21 weeks (range: 1-87), with 1 patient continuing on treatment. Thirty-five (90%) patients were evaluable for tumor response. Four patients (10%) discontinued prior to initial tumor assessment: death (n = 1), disease progression (n = 2) and investigator's discretion (n = 1). The most common TEAEs (any grade/≥gr 3, independent of causality) and common lab abnormalities are summarized in Table 1. There were 4 TEAEs that led to study drug discontinuation (all n = 1): cardiac arrest, pruritus, pyrexia, and maculopapular rash. Six deaths were reported, none of which were related to study drug. The ORR was 15% (90% CI: 6.9%, 28.1%), with 6 (15%) patients achieving a PR and 23 (59%) patients maintaining a stable disease. The PFS rate at week 16 was 66% (95% CI: 46%, 79%). Median PFS was 5.6 months (95% CI: 3.6 months, 8.9 months). These results are based on data analysis of June 28, 2016. Conclusion: Entospletinib was well tolerated and demonstrated modest activity in patients with relapsed or refractory MCL. Further development of entospletinib in MCL will focus on the development of combination therapy. Figure 1 Waterfall Plot of Best % Change from Baseline in SPD. Figure 1. Waterfall Plot of Best % Change from Baseline in SPD. Figure 2 Kaplan-Meier Curve of Progression-Free Survival. Figure 2. Kaplan-Meier Curve of Progression-Free Survival. Disclosures Sharman: Gilead Sciences, Inc.: Honoraria, Research Funding. Kolibaba:Amgen: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Cell Therapeutics: Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding; GSK: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; Acerta: Research Funding; Gilead: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Pharmcyclics: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; TG Therapeutics: Honoraria, Research Funding. Shustov:Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; SPECTRUM: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding. Nay:Gilead Sciences, Inc.: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria, Other: Advisory board; Celgene: Honoraria, Other: Advisory board; Amgen: Other: Advisory board; Lyndbeck: Honoraria; BMS: Honoraria. Zhang:Gilead Sciences: Employment, Equity Ownership. Shi:Gilead Sciences, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Forero:University of Alabama at Birmingham: Research Funding. Assouline:BMS: Speakers Bureau; Lundbeck: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Speakers Bureau.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.086
Threshold uncertainty score0.329

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.317
Teacher spread0.296 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBloodSame topicChronic Lymphocytic Leukemia ResearchFrench-language works237,207