MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2767474014 · doi:10.1002/2017je005420

The Vertical Dust Profile Over Gale Crater, Mars

2017· article· en· W2767474014 on OpenAlexaff
Scott D. Guzewich, Claire Newman, M. D. Smith, John E. Moores, C. L. Smith, Casey A. Moore, M. I. Richardson, D. M. Kass, A. Kleinböhl, M. A. Mischna, Javier Martín‐Torres, María‐Paz Zorzano, J. Michael Battalio

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Geophysical Research Planets · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicPlanetary Science and Exploration
Canadian institutionsYork University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMars Exploration ProgramImpact craterDust stormSolsticeAtmospheric sciencesAtmosphere (unit)GeologyMixing ratioSouthern HemisphereAltitude (triangle)Atmosphere of MarsOpacityPlanetary boundary layerEnvironmental scienceStormClimatologyMeteorologyLatitudePhysicsAstrobiologyMartianGeodesyGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract We create a vertically coarse, but complete, profile of dust mixing ratio from the surface to the upper atmosphere over Gale Crater, Mars, using the frequent joint atmospheric observations of the orbiting Mars Climate Sounder (MCS) and the Mars Science Laboratory Curiosity rover. Using these data and an estimate of planetary boundary layer (PBL) depth from the MarsWRF general circulation model, we divide the vertical column into three regions. The first region is the Gale Crater PBL, the second is the MCS‐sampled region, and the third is between these first two. We solve for a well‐mixed dust mixing ratio within this third (middle) layer of atmosphere to complete the profile. We identify a unique seasonal cycle of dust within each atmospheric layer. Within the Gale PBL, dust mixing ratio maximizes near southern hemisphere summer solstice ( L s = 270°) and minimizes near winter solstice ( L s = 90–100°) with a smooth sinusoidal transition between them. However, the layer above Gale Crater and below the MCS‐sampled region more closely follows the global opacity cycle and has a maximum in opacity near L s = 240° and exhibits a local minimum (associated with the “solsticial pause” in dust storm activity) near L s = 270°. With knowledge of the complete vertical dust profile, we can also assess the frequency of high‐altitude dust layers over Gale. We determine that 36% of MCS profiles near Gale Crater contain an “absolute” high‐altitude dust layer wherein the dust mixing ratio is the maximum in the entire vertical column.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.632
Threshold uncertainty score0.976

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.059
GPT teacher head0.359
Teacher spread0.300 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations31
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Geophysical Research PlanetsSame topicPlanetary Science and ExplorationFrench-language works237,207