MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2767499793 · doi:10.4000/books.pum.4314

Guerre, science et technologie

2015· book-chapter· fr· W2767499793 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Serge Bernier

Bibliographic record

VenuePresses de l’Université de Montréal eBooks · 2015
Typebook-chapter
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicPhilosophical and Theoretical Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversity of Illinois at Urbana-ChampaignOrganisation de Coopération et de Développement ÉconomiquesUniversity of TorontoJohns Hopkins UniversityPrinceton UniversityUniversity of OxfordHarvard UniversityUniversity of CambridgeWayne State UniversityState University of New YorkStanford Bio-XStyrelsen för Internationellt Utvecklingssamarbete
KeywordsAppropriationPolitical scienceHumanitiesArtPhilosophyEpistemology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Derrière les combats et les armements, nous retrouvons un arsenal de relations, de connaissances et d’objets comme les rapports sociaux, la science, la technologie et les innovations, dont les applications sont aussi bien civiles que militaires (voir État, pouvoir et science).Les savants ne sont pas étrangers à la guerre. Archimède s’implique dans la défense de Syracuse. Léonard de Vinci se fait ingénieur militaire. Nicolo Tartaglia pose les fondat

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.543
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.007
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.205
Teacher spread0.176 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePresses de l’Université de Montréal eBooksSame topicPhilosophical and Theoretical AnalysisFrench-language works237,207