Persistencias y rupturas espaciales en el Área Metropolitana de Córdoba, Argentina: descomposición gráfica - conceptual de la forma urbana del período 1980 - 2016
Bibliographic record
Abstract
El modelo de ciudad- territorio de la dispersión demanda para su abordaje una aproximación transescalar. La lectura a través de los Sistemas Urbanos Territoriales y los Patrones de Asentamiento facilita arribar a la complejidad del AMC por medio de síntesis interpretativas, que al ser superpuestas posibilitan visualizar la integridad de las operaciones territoriales del periodo 1980-2016. Esto permite identificar cómo los temas emergentes se manifiestan en nuestro contexto impulsados o mitigados por las circunstancias propias del espacio metropolitano cordobés que, derivados de lógicas arraigadas a procesos temporales, determinan las formas de desarrollo urbano imperantes y las tendencias de crecimiento. La representación grafica manual se considera indispensable en la comprensión, apropiación, interpretación y construcción de nuevo conocimiento, como así también en la transmisión del mismo. La reformulación del área desde esta perspectiva podría promover lineamientos de proyecto más integrales, sensibles y responsables con el medio. The city-territory model of dispersion demands a trans-scalar approach for its approach. Reading through the Territorial Urban Systems and Settlement Patterns makes it easy to arrive at the complexity of the AMC by means of interpretive syntheses that, when overlapped, make it possible to visualize the integrity of the territorial operations of the period 1980-201. This allows us to identify how the emergent themes are manifested in our context driven or mitigated by the circumstances of the metropolitan space of Cordoba that, derived from logics rooted in temporal processes, determine the forms of prevailing urban development and trends of growth. Manual graphic representation is considered indispensable in the understanding, appropriation, interpretation and construction of new knowledge, as well as in the transmission of the same. The reformulation of the area from this perspective could promote more comprehensive, sensitive and responsible project guidelines with the environment.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".