MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2767576765

Constraints on Immediate Memory for Prosody: Evidence of a Correspondence with the Prosodic Organization of Speech

2005· article· en· W2767576765 on OpenAlexafffund
Victor J. Boucher, Annie C. Gilbert

Bibliographic record

VenueeScholarship (California Digital Library) · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicPhonetics and Phonology Research
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
FundersSocial Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada
KeywordsProsodyStress (linguistics)LinguisticsContext (archaeology)PsychologyRecallCognitive psychologyHistory
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study investigates the correspondence between memory of stress rhythms in the context of a serial recall task and the organization of stress patterns in meaningful utterances.French speakers' (n = 40) reproduction of stress patterns in recalling series of syllables with stress groups of differing size shows a floor effect for groups that exceed four syllables.A second experiment where the Ss (n = 39) produced utterances with phrases of differing length indicates a strong tendency to insert stress marks in phrases that exceed four syllables.Taken together, the findings provide an initial demonstration that memory for prosodic patterns can be an organizational factor of prosody in speech.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.666
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.283
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2005
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueeScholarship (California Digital Library)Same topicPhonetics and Phonology ResearchFrench-language works237,207