MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2767598848 · doi:10.1353/cwh.2017.0062

Bonds of Union: Religion, Race, and Politics in a Civil War Borderland by Bridget Ford

2017· article· en· W2767598848 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Kelly D. Mezurek

Bibliographic record

VenueCivil War history · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicAmerican Constitutional Law and Politics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPoliticsSpanish Civil WarSecessionProtestantismLawSociologyPolitical scienceReligious studiesPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reviewed by: Bonds of Union: Religion, Race, and Politics in a Civil War Borderland by Bridget Ford Kelly D. Mezurek Bonds of Union: Religion, Race, and Politics in a Civil War Borderland. Bridget Ford. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 2016. ISBN 978-1-4696-2622-2, 424 pp., cloth, $45.00. In Bonds of Union: Religion, Race, and Politics in a Civil War Borderland, Bridget Ford explores what the "bonds of union" meant to nineteenth-century Americans. Whether used in formal speeches or in more informal ways, the phrase had a religious, familial, or political connotation. Ford argues that most understood the concept as a combination of these notions, and more importantly, the "bonds of union" helped bridge differences between white and black, Catholic and Protestant, and northern and southern Americans. This contributed to the abolition of slavery and the Union victory during the Civil War. Importantly, Ford insists that while these deeply held ideals of union ultimately triumphed, they did not increase the white population's receptivity toward African Americans as equals. Ford focuses her attention on the Ohio River Valley borderlands of Cincinnati and Louisville. Despite the diversity between the region and people in these two cities, they were strongly linked by commerce, politics, and religion. Enough so, posits Ford, that the populations had "strong-enough bonds of union to weather" the violence wrought by antebellum reform, secession, and fratricidal conflict (xii). These contested yet resilient connections presented by Ford challenge the notion of the Ohio River as the overt demarcation line between the North and South. Instead of relying on traditional political and wartime rhetoric and policies, Ford interrogates the "realm of culture" to uncover "concrete action and real human relations" that "took place within, but also dramatically altered, a larger political context" (xiv). Specifically, she looks at the abstract bonds present in preaching styles, devotional literature, antislavery fiction and poetry, and historical writings. Her deft analysis of this evidence provides both an original and important contribution to our understanding of mid-nineteenth-century American culture and history. The book is divided into three main parts: religion, race, and sectional divide. Many people in the two borderland urban centers remained steadfast in their focus on these challenging issues. The first three chapters examine the growth of and competition between the Protestant and Catholic Churches. Using missionary work, revivals, religious print culture, and church architecture, Ford shows how the two groups actually began to become more alike in many ways. Although they had some different objectives, black churches also played a role in the creation of prewar "bonds of union" in both cities. The second section tackles race, freedom, and slavery within the context of national political and social change. Despite the severity of Ohio's Black Laws and the resolute commitment to slavery in Kentucky, black residents in both cities created independent institutions. In addition to churches, the rapidly growing black populations supported schools and social organizations as they fought for civil and political rights. The Ohio River provided a means for movement, escape, and economic opportunities [End Page 433] as enslaved and free African Americans intermingled. The borderland was also a dangerous place for free blacks, who faced violence from working-class whites, feared kidnapping and enslavement, and challenged threats of colonization. After the 1850 Fugitive Slave Act, black leaders contemplated emigration, and although a significant number moved to Canada, most remained determined to stay and fight for their citizenship and rights. Others took advantage of the opportunities to benefit financially from service occupations that catered to the growing white middle class in both urban centers. Additionally, Ford offers a needed counter narrative that argues that a much more collaborative effort between black and white abolitionists existed. Although limited in success, they worked to help runaway slaves abolish slavery, and sought equal access to education and literacy. Through activism and literature, the shared desire for enlightenment became a strong bond of union. The final section covers the growing sectional divisions within the country as they played out in the two cities bound by economic ties. Ford explores the political divide that grew as a result of the split within the Methodist and Baptist Churches...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.874
Threshold uncertainty score0.992

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.003
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.267
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCivil War historySame topicAmerican Constitutional Law and PoliticsFrench-language works237,207