MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2767712841 · doi:10.1093/neuonc/nox168.859

RARE-06. CANADIAN PATTERNS OF PRACTICE FOR INTRACRANIAL GERM CELL TUMOURS IN ADOLESCENTS AND YOUNG ADULTS

2017· article· en· W2767712841 on OpenAlexaffabout
Andrea Lo, Normand Laperrière, David Hodgson, Éric Bouffet, James C. Nicholson, Michael McKenzie, Juliette Hukin, Karen Goddard

Bibliographic record

VenueNeuro-Oncology · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGlioma Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsHospital for Sick ChildrenPrincess Margaret Cancer CentreBC Children's HospitalBC Cancer Agency
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineRadiation therapyGerminomaGerm cell tumorsChemotherapySpecialtyPediatricsSurgeryPathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

To describe Canadian patterns of practice for intracranial germ cell tumours (IGCT) in adolescents and young adults (AYA), and to determine factors associated with treatment approaches in this disease. A survey was written containing questions on the management of two 17-year old males, one with localized pineal germinoma and the other with localized pineal non-germinoma germ cell tumor (NGGCT). An invitation to participate anonymously in the survey was e-mailed to 119 oncologists who treat brain tumors across Canada. Seventy-two (61%) of the 119 oncologists participated in the study. For the germinoma case, the most common treatment approaches were whole ventricular radiotherapy (WVRT) and chemotherapy (CH) (57%), WVRT without CH (15%), and craniospinal radiotherapy (CSRT) without CH (10%); of those who recommended WVRT+CH, 57% recommended 24Gy, 20% recommended 18Gy, 9% recommended 36Gy, and 9% stated that the radiation dose would depend on tumour response to chemotherapy. Chemotherapy was included in the treatment of germinoma by 96% of pediatric physicians vs. 54% of adult physicians (P=0.001). The most common treatment approaches for NGGCT were CSRT+CH (38%), WVRT+CH (18%), and pineal gland radiotherapy and CH (13%); of those who chose CSRT+CH, 74% recommended 36Gy, 15% recommended 24Gy, and 4% recommended 18Gy. The selection of craniospinal vs. smaller-volume radiotherapy was not associated with the physicians’ specialty, percentage of practice treating brain tumours, number of IGCT seen in the past 5 years, or size of institution. There is wide variation in the management of IGCT in AYA across Canada. A 17-year old male with a localized pineal germinoma is highly likely to receive chemotherapy if managed by a pediatric physician, while the same patient is much less likely to receive chemotherapy if managed by an adult physician. Future efforts should focus on improving consistency in the management of IGCT in AYA.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.037
Threshold uncertainty score0.113

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.004
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0140.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.294
Teacher spread0.280 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNeuro-Oncology→Same topicGlioma Diagnosis and Treatment→French-language works237,207→