MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2767815677 · doi:10.29173/af29340

« Mettre une fausse barbe au second degré » : La figure du jeune terroriste dans deux romans d’YB

2017· article· fr· W2767815677 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Laura Fuchs-Eisner

Bibliographic record

VenueALTERNATIVE FRANCOPHONE · 2017
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicMulticulturalism, Politics, Migration, Gender
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArtPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Le motif du terrorisme constitue le fil rouge à travers l’œuvre d’Y.B. C’est notamment la figure du jeune terroriste (franco-) algérien qui domine ses romans. Fortement teintés par la satire et l’humour noir, les textes d’Y.B. évitent pourtant la tentation du pathos en cherchant « la vraie contestation [qui] vient par la forme » (Y.B. 1998, 15). C’est l’exagération comique du discours de l’autre qui lui sert à le démasquer et à démontrer ces côtés grotesques. Après une brève vue d’ensemble du contexte socio-historique et de l’œuvre d’Y.B., l’article cherche à démontrer comment ses romans s’approchent de la figure du terroriste tout en constituant une réflexion sur la forme appropriée d’un tel projet. Pour démontrer comment les préoccupations politiques d’Y.B. l’amènent à une critique sévère des pouvoirs et comment son jeu satirique et son ton ironique créent la distance nécessaire à l’articulation des nuances, les romans ‘parisiens’ Allah Superstar (2003) et Bugsy Pinsky contre le complot juif (2010) seront analysés en plus de détail.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.045
Threshold uncertainty score0.089

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0140.021
Scholarly communication0.0070.003
Open science0.0000.003
Research integrity0.0020.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.067
GPT teacher head0.365
Teacher spread0.298 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueALTERNATIVE FRANCOPHONESame topicMulticulturalism, Politics, Migration, GenderFrench-language works237,207