MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2767823839 · doi:10.20961/arst.v13i2.15662

DAMPAK PERUBAHAN MODAL SOSIAL TERHADAP PERUBAHAN SISTEM PENGOLAHAN SAMPAH DI YOGYAKARTA

2017· article· en· W2767823839 on OpenAlexaff
Theresia Damai T., Kusumastuti Kusumastuti, Isti Andini

Bibliographic record

VenueArsitektura · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicWaste Management and Recycling
Canadian institutionsEncana (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGarbageSocial capitalCapital (architecture)ReputationBusinessSustainabilityPolitical scienceSociologyEnvironmental economicsBusiness administrationEngineeringEconomicsWaste managementGeographySocial science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

<p><em>Badran village is a village that used to have a reputation as thugs village and face the problem of garbage. Over time, this village managed to overcome the problem of garbage with 3R-based waste management program. This success is motivated by changes in social capital and leadership as a catalyst in the presence of co-operation. Forms of social capital that result in changes in the waste management system RW 11 Kampung Badran is trust, norms and networks. The third form of social capital and the existence of aspects of leadership affects the sustainability of programs aimed at managing waste in RW 11, Kampung Badran. For that we need further review of how the influence of the three components of social capital that is trust, norms and networks of the waste management system. The method used the descriptive qualitative method with the presentation of narrative technique. Based on the method applied was found that all three forms of social capital affects the implementation of waste management activities in the form of bank program garbage, composting and manufacture craft of garbage. Trust influence the process of knowledge transfer of cadres to the citizens, norms affect the implementation of programs and networks organizing effect on the acquisition of outside resources.</em><em></em></p><p><strong><em> </em></strong></p><p><strong><em>Keywords:</em></strong><em> </em><em>social capital, trust, norms, network, 3R</em></p>

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.133
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueArsitekturaSame topicWaste Management and RecyclingFrench-language works237,207