MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2767841842 · doi:10.2495/safe-v7-n4-498-509

A direct procedure for the seismic design of frame structures with added viscous dampers

2017· article· en· W2767841842 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Stefano Silvestri, Michele Palermo, Tomaso Trombetti

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Safety and Security Engineering · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicStructural Engineering and Vibration Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersDipartimento della Protezione Civile, Presidenza del Consiglio dei Ministri
KeywordsDamperStructural engineeringFrame (networking)Computer scienceRigid frameGeologyEngineeringMechanical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A direct procedure for the seismic design of building structures with added viscous dampers is described in this paper.The procedure is applicable to regular multi-storey frame structures, which are characterized by a period of vibration lower than 1.5 s.It aims at providing practical tools for a direct identification of the mechanical characteristics of the manufactured viscous dampers, which allow to achieve target levels of performances.Typically, the design philosophy is to limit the structural damages under severe earthquakes.In more detail, the procedure may be summarized as follows.First, a target damping reduction factor is selected to achieve a desired reduction in the peak structural response under earthquake excitation.Second, linear damping coefficients are calculated taking advantage of the properties of the modal damping ratios of classically damped systems.Then, analytical formulas allow the estimation of peak velocities and forces in the dissipative devices, and an energy criterion is used to identify the non-linear mechanical characteristics of the actual manufactured viscous dampers.Finally, the internal actions in the structural elements are estimated through the envelope of two equivalent static analyses (ESA), namely: ESA1 in which the naked structure is subjected to a given set of equivalent lateral forces, and ESA2 in which the structure, with rigid diagonal braces substituting the added viscous dampers, is subjected to a top floor lateral force.At this stage of the research, the procedure is suitable for the preliminary design phase, since correction factors for the higher modes contributions are necessary to improve its accuracy, especially for high-rise buildings.A numerical verification of the final behaviour of the system by means of non-linear time-history analyses is recommended.An applicative example is finally provided to highlight the simplicity of the proposed procedure.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.026

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Safety and Security EngineeringSame topicStructural Engineering and Vibration AnalysisFrench-language works237,207