Abstract 17612: Hypertension Severity is Associated With Impaired Cognitive Performance
Bibliographic record
Abstract
B: Hypertension affects the target-organs diversely. Most evidence on target-organ damage in hypertension is related to kidney and heart. The cerebrovascular and cognitive impairment are less studied. O: To study the cognitive function changes in patients with hypertension on different stages compared to the control pairs and their correlation with the arterial stiffness properties assessed by non-invasive methods and cerebral circulation assessed by transcranial Doppler. M: In a cross sectional study 162 patients (42 controls and 120 hypertensive) were comparatively evaluated. Hypertensive patients were divided in three stages according to the blood pressure levels or medication use (HTN-1: BP 140-159/90-99 or use of one antihypertensive drug; HTN-2: BP 160-179/100-109 or use of two drugs and HTN-3: BP ≥180/110 or use of three or more drugs). The following variables were evaluated: pulse wave velocity, intima medial thickness, cerebral blood flow velocities by transcranial Doppler (TD) and cognitive function. Mean velocity of middle cerebral artery was continuously monitored at resting and during the breath holding test (30 seconds) and 3 minutes handgrip maneuver. Cognitive function was assessed by mini mental state examination and Montreal Cognitive Assessment. R: Compared to control group, HTN-3 group was older, had higher BMI, IMT and PWV and lower educational level and family income (Table 1). Interestingly, the higher the hypertension stage the poorer was the performance in cognitive tests even after age correction. There was no difference among the groups related to TD velocities at rest and the hand-grip maneuver. However, it was noted a lower breath holding index in the hypertensive group (HTN-1=0.94±0.56; HTN-3=0.97±0.59 vs Control=1.5±0.68; p=0.002) which could infer less vasomotor reactivity in these patients. C: Cognitive impairment was more frequent in patients with hypertension and this frequency was related to hypertension severity.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".