Chapitre 7. Planification et participation à Vancouver
Bibliographic record
Abstract
La mondialisation affecte de manière irréversible les régions urbaines et contribue à la remise en question de l’État ; les villes sont considérées comme des lieux de production et de création de richesses. Ces changements contribuent aux débats sur les meilleurs modes de gouvernement aux niveaux local et régional. Bien que les régions urbaines prennent des formes variées, la littérature sur les grandes villes étudie ces changements autour de thèmes tels que la disparition de zones naturelles, la croissance des réseaux de transport et l’augmentation des inégalités sociales, mais elle les décrit aussi comme des espaces démocratiques, où l’engagement civique et la solidarité sont importants. Ce chapitre relate comment, au cours des quinze dernières années, la méfiance du gouvernement a sapé les tentatives locales et régionales de coordination et de collaboration, et a permis à la province d’influer en profondeur sur la régie régionale de la planification, des transports et du logement.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.023 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".