MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2767950912 · doi:10.26881/srg.2017.4.25

Постсоветская историография 1917 года и некоторые проблемы контекстуализации. случай Антонио Грамши

2017· article· en· W2767950912 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Наталья Г. Терехова

Bibliographic record

VenueStudia Rossica Gedanensia · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicPolitical theory and Gramsci
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsContextualizationHistoriographyQuarter (Canadian coin)Power (physics)Soviet unionPolitical scienceHistoryEconomic historyLawPoliticsPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Post-Soviet Historiography of 1917 and certain problems of contextualization. Antonio Gramsci’s CaseA quarter of a century ago, historians gained access to Soviet archives. Consequently, the events of the Revolution of 1917 finally received a comprehensive unbiased coverage by Russian scholars. The success of this work is impressive, but it also sets new tasks including the contextualization of the activities of foreign communists in Soviet Russia after the Bolsheviks came to power and established the Comintern. Among these figures was the famous and very popular Italian Antonio Gramsi.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.817
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0090.004
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.048
GPT teacher head0.381
Teacher spread0.333 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueStudia Rossica GedanensiaSame topicPolitical theory and GramsciFrench-language works237,207