MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2767955851 · doi:10.1002/sta4.159

A class of flexible models for analysis of complex structured correlated data with application to clustered longitudinal data

2017· article· en· W2767955851 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueStat · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicStatistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
Canadian institutionsUniversity of CalgaryWestern UniversityUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPairwise comparisonComputer scienceClass (philosophy)Generalized linear mixed modelLongitudinal dataData miningLinear modelGeneralized linear modelTheoretical computer scienceMachine learningArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Generalized linear mixed models have been widely used in correlated data analysis. The applicability of these models is, however, hampered when data possess multilevel complex association structures. For instance, for longitudinal data arising in clusters, modelling complexity is a serious issue, and it is desirable to develop flexible models that are both computationally manageable and interpretatively meaningful. For these purposes, we propose a new class of flexible models, pairwise generalized linear mixed models, to facilitate correlated data that may possess multilevel complex association structures. Inferential procedures are developed to accommodate the proposed modelling framework, and asymptotic properties of the proposed method are established. The proposed models are evaluated through numerical studies. Copyright © 2017 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.783
Threshold uncertainty score0.353

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.361
GPT teacher head0.476
Teacher spread0.115 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it