Las seis vidas de una frase: el salmo canario o padrenuestro guanche
Bibliographic record
Abstract
espanolEn 1934, E. Hardisson presento en el Instituto de Estudios Canarios una frase descubierta en un manuscrito de 1803 que, aparentemente, recogia el tercer versiculo del salmo 113 (112) traducido a la lengua de los antiguos canarios: Atisa cagnren cha ondikhuesate antichiaha onanda erari. En la decada siguiente la frase fue estudiada por D.J. Wolfel y otros investigadores, que no llegaron a ninguna conclusion sobre su significado o fiabilidad. En este trabajo demuestro que la frase fue compuesta por A. Kircher hacia 1645 uniendo dos fragmentos de una oracion en la lengua de los indios hurones del Canada publicada en 1637 y que, por tanto, no tiene absolutamente nada que ver con las antiguas lenguas canarias o bereberes. Ello pone en entredicho tanto su presencia en la tradicion oral del sur de Tenerife en la segunda mitad del siglo pasado como la metodologia empleada en una reciente transcripcion al bereber. English«The six lives of a phrase: the Canarian psalm or Guanche paternoster». In 1934, E. Hardisson presented at the Instituto de Estudios Canarios a phrase discovered in a manuscript from 1803 that apparently contained the third verse of Psalm 113 (112) translated to the language of the ancient Canarians: Atisa cagnren cha ondikhuesate antichiaha onanda erari. In the next decade the phrase was studied by D.J. Wolfel and other researchers, who did not reach any conclusion about its meaning or reliability. This paper shows that the phrase was composed by A. Kircher about 1645 by joining two fragments of a prayer in the language of the Huron Indians from Canada published in 1637, therefore it has absolutely nothing to do with the ancient Canarian or Berber languages. This calls into question its presence in the oral tradition of the south of Tenerife in the second half of the past century, as well as the methodology used in a recent transcription into Berber
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.006 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".