FAKTOR PENGHAMBAT KERAJINAN ANYAMAN TANGAN DI PERBATASAN SAJINGAN BESAR DALAM MENGHADAPI MASYARAKAT EKONOMI ASEAN
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Salah satu kerajinan anyaman tangan Kalimantan Barat berasal dari perbatasan Sajingan Besar Kabupaten Sambas, kerajinan anyaman tangan tersebut merupakan warisan secara turun temurun yang membutuhkan pembinaan melalui inovasi dari regenerasi baru. Metode penelitian ini menggunakan analisis kualitatif, peneliti melakukan wawancara dari berbagai informan dan mengumpulkan data sekunder dari instansi terkait. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan terdapat dua faktor penghambat pengembangan kerajinan anyaman tangan di wilayah perbatasan Sajingan Besar Kabupaten Sambas dalam menghadapi Masyarakat Ekonomi ASEAN yaitu: 1) pola pikir masyarakat kurang inovatif dikarenakan kurangnya lembaga pendidikan dan pembinaan anyaman kerajinan untuk masyarakat sehingga kerajinan anyaman tangan sulit berkembang. Rendahnya kualitas sumber daya manusia membuat pelaksanaan Masyarakat Ekonomi ASEAN tidak terlalu dirasakan oleh masyarakat perbatasan Sajingan Besar Kabupaten Sambas; 2) pemasaran produktifitas kerajinan anyaman tangan terkendala karena belum diresmikannya Pos Lintas Batas Negara Aruk di Kabupaten Sambas sehingga produk kerajinan anyaman tangan di wilayah perbatasan Sajingan Besar Kabupaten Sambas sulit bersaing dalam menghadapi Masyarakat Ekonomi ASEAN.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.034 | 0.007 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".