Application of FMRAC to fault‐tolerant cooperative control of a wind farm with decreased power generation due to blade erosion/debris buildup
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Summary Wind energy has shown a remarkable potential for fulfilling the increasing world's energy demand in a clean and sustainable way. The wind energy industry has installed increasingly sophisticated and larger wind turbines particularly in offshore regions to capture such energy as efficiently and cost effectively as possible. The rapid growth in size and capacity of wind turbines together with harsh climate conditions and limited accessibility in offshore regions all result in higher failure rates and increased maintenance requirements and costs. Such difficulties motivate the use of advanced fault detection and diagnosis and fault‐tolerant control schemes in wind farms to improve their reliability and availability. Given the importance of this issue, this paper uses a fuzzy model reference adaptive control approach in a cooperative framework that is oriented to the design and development of a novel fault‐tolerant cooperative control scheme in a wind farm. This scheme handles decreased power generation faults in a wind farm caused by turbine blade erosion and debris buildup on the blades over time. The effectiveness and performance of the proposed scheme is demonstrated by a series of simulations on an advanced large offshore wind farm benchmark model in the presence of wind turbulence, measurement noise, load variations, and realistic fault scenarios.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".