MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2768135677 · doi:10.1017/cnj.2017.47

Syntaxe du français médiéval et changement linguistique : Études de corpus

2017· article· fr· W2768135677 on OpenAlexaffabout
Monique Dufresne, Marie Labelle

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Canadian Journal of Linguistics / La revue canadienne de linguistique · 2017
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicLexicography and Language Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à MontréalQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPhilosophyCorpus linguisticsLinguistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ce numéro spécial de la Revue canadienne de linguistique présente un ensemble d’études sur le français médiéval découlant d'un colloque qui a eu lieu à l'UQAM les 3 et 4 octobre 2014 sous le thème « L'utilisation des corpus (annotés) pour comprendre le changement linguistique ». Dans cette introduction, nous mettrons en évidence trois facteurs qui donnent à ce numéro son intérêt et son unité : les thèmes abordés, les approches linguistiques et sociolinguistiques et les modes d'utilisation des corpus.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.502
Threshold uncertainty score0.997

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0060.016
Science and technology studies0.0040.004
Scholarly communication0.0050.003
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Canadian Journal of Linguistics / La revue canadienne de linguistiqueSame topicLexicography and Language StudiesFrench-language works237,207