Preoperative quantitative dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI and diffusion-weighted imaging predict aggressive disease in endometrial cancer
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background Quantitative dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) and diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) may yield preoperative tumor biomarkers relevant for prognosis and therapy in cancer. Purpose To explore the value of preoperative DCE-MRI and DWI for the prediction of aggressive disease in endometrial cancer patients. Material and Methods Preoperative MRI (1.5-T) from 177 patients were analyzed and imaging parameters reflecting tumor microvasculature (from DCE-MRI) and tumor microstructure (from DWI) were estimated. The derived imaging parameters were explored in relation to clinico-pathological stage, histological subtype and grade, molecular markers, and patient outcome. Results Low tumor blood flow (F b ) and low rate constant for contrast agent intravasation (k ep ) were associated with high-risk histological subtype ( P ≤ 0.04 for both) and tended to be associated with poor prognosis ( P ≤ 0.09). Low tumor apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) value and large tumor volume were both significantly associated with deep myometrial invasion ( P < 0.001 for both) and were also unfavorable prognostic factors ( P = 0.05 and P < 0.001, respectively). Conclusion DCE-MRI and DWI represent valuable supplements to conventional MRI by providing preoperative imaging biomarkers that predict aggressive disease in endometrial cancer patients.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".