MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2768165234 · doi:10.3905/jai.2002.319066

How to Create and Manage a Hedge Fund

2002· article· en· W2768165234 on OpenAlexaffabout
Greg N. Gregoriou

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Alternative Investments · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicState Capitalism and Financial Governance
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHedge fundBusinessAlternative betaHedgeFinanceFinancial economicsEconomicsOpen-end fundInstitutional investorCorporate governance

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

How to Create & Manage a Hedge Fund: A Professional's Guide , by Stuart A. McCrary, John Wiley and Sons, 2002. 1. Greg N. Gregoriou 1. A Ph.D. candidate and the Institut de Finance Mathématique de Montréal Scholar in the finance program at the University of Quebec at Montreal. (gregoriou.g{at}uqam.ca) The recently published book How to Create and Manage a Hedge Fund by Stuart McCrary is reviewed in this section.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.024
Threshold uncertainty score0.081

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0060.005
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0240.025

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.050
GPT teacher head0.236
Teacher spread0.186 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2002
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Alternative InvestmentsSame topicState Capitalism and Financial GovernanceFrench-language works237,207