Synthesis of Single Crystal LiNi<sub>0.5</sub>Mn<sub>0.3</sub>Co<sub>0.2</sub>O<sub>2</sub>for Lithium Ion Batteries
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Single crystal Li[Ni 0.5 Mn 0.3 Co 0.2 ]O 2 materials in NMC532/artificial graphite cells have excellent long term charge-discharge cycle lifetime which greatly exceeds that of conventional NMC532 materials. There are a few patents from industry regarding the synthesis of single crystal NMC. In addition, there have only been a few reports in the academic literature showing that single crystal NMC with a grain size of ∼2–5 μm having good electrochemical performance was successfully synthesized, but these workers used complex approaches. This work systematically studies the steps required to synthesize single crystal NMC materials. The key synthesis steps including the impact of the Li to transition metal ratio, sintering temperature, precursor size and sintering time are discussed. This work provides guidance for the synthesis of single crystal NMC positive electrode materials that may be suitable for lithium-ion cells with high energy density and long lifetime.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".