MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2768248400 · doi:10.1021/acs.jpcb.7b10256

Computational Study of Engineered Cytochrome P450-Catalyzed C–H Amination: The Origin of the Regio- and Stereoselectivity

2017· article· en· W2768248400 on OpenAlexafffund
Zhe Li, D. Jean Burnell, Russell J. Boyd

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Physical Chemistry B · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicSynthesis and Catalytic Reactions
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsStereoselectivityAminationCatalysisChemistryCytochrome P450StereochemistryOrganic chemistryEnzyme

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cytochrome P450 enzymes were recently engineered to catalyze the C-H amination reaction of aryl sulfonyl azides with excellent regio- and stereoselectivity (Arnold and co-workers J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014 , 136 , 15505 ). The mechanism of this reaction was studied by quantum mechanical (QM)/molecular mechanical (MM) calculations in this work. The C-H activation is found to be a stepwise process consisting of hydrogen abstraction (H-abstraction) of the reactive C-H bond by an iron nitrenoid cofactor to produce the biradical intermediate and subsequent radical rebinding to form the final product. The rate of rotation of the carbon radical center was estimated to be much faster than that of radical rebinding, which implies that the H-abstraction does not determine the stereoselectivity. For mutant A, the H-abstraction step has a barrier of 16.7 kcal/mol, which is 3.0 kcal/mol higher than that of the following radical rebinding step. The H-abstraction step determines the regioselectivity, but the radical rebinding step determines the stereoselectivity. Barriers of these two steps are 16.1 and 27.5 kcal/mol, respectively, for mutant B. It is different from mutant A in that the radical rebinding step has the higher barrier and determines both the regio- and stereoselectivity. The initial distances between the hydrogens of reactive C-H bonds and the iron nitrenoid were found to not correlate with their reactivities. The calculated barriers are qualitatively consistent with the experimentally observed regio- and stereoselectivity with the exception of the stereoselectivity of mutant B. The lower barriers of mutant A presumably come from the stabilization effect of the H-bond between G265 and the sulfone O. This H-bond does not exist in mutant B. The conformation of the protein backbone, with the exception of the active site, does not change much (RMSD < 0.05) along the reaction pathway.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.028

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.272
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations28
Published2017
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Physical Chemistry BSame topicSynthesis and Catalytic ReactionsFrench-language works237,207