Analysis of the Anisotropic Magnetocaloric Effect in RMn2O5 Single Crystals
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Thanks to the strong magnetic anisotropy shown by the multiferroic RMn2O5 (R = magnetic rare earth) compounds, a large adiabatic temperature change can be induced (around 10 K) by rotating them in constant magnetic fields instead of the standard magnetization-demagnetization method. Particularly, the TbMn2O5 single crystal reveals a giant rotating magnetocaloric effect (RMCE) under relatively low constant magnetic fields reachable by permanent magnets. On the other hand, the nature of R3+ ions strongly affects their RMCEs. For example, the maximum rotating adiabatic temperature change exhibited by TbMn2O5 is more than five times larger than that presented by HoMn2O5 in a constant magnetic field of 2 T. In this paper, we mainly focus on the physics behind the RMCE shown by RMn2O5 multiferroics. We particularly demonstrate that the rare earth size could play a crucial role in determining the magnetic order, and accordingly, the rotating magnetocaloric properties of RMn2O5 compounds through the modulation of exchange interactions via lattice distortions. This is a scenario that seems to be supported by Raman scattering measurements.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it