End-to-End Blind Image Quality Assessment Using Deep Neural Networks
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We propose a multi-task end-to-end optimized deep neural network (MEON) for blind image quality assessment (BIQA). MEON consists of two sub-networks-a distortion identification network and a quality prediction network-sharing the early layers. Unlike traditional methods used for training multi-task networks, our training process is performed in two steps. In the first step, we train a distortion type identification sub-network, for which large-scale training samples are readily available. In the second step, starting from the pre-trained early layers and the outputs of the first sub-network, we train a quality prediction sub-network using a variant of the stochastic gradient descent method. Different from most deep neural networks, we choose biologically inspired generalized divisive normalization (GDN) instead of rectified linear unit as the activation function. We empirically demonstrate that GDN is effective at reducing model parameters/layers while achieving similar quality prediction performance. With modest model complexity, the proposed MEON index achieves state-of-the-art performance on four publicly available benchmarks. Moreover, we demonstrate the strong competitiveness of MEON against state-of-the-art BIQA models using the group maximum differentiation competition methodology.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it