End-to-End Blind Image Quality Assessment Using Deep Neural Networks
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We propose a multi-task end-to-end optimized deep neural network (MEON) for blind image quality assessment (BIQA). MEON consists of two sub-networks-a distortion identification network and a quality prediction network-sharing the early layers. Unlike traditional methods used for training multi-task networks, our training process is performed in two steps. In the first step, we train a distortion type identification sub-network, for which large-scale training samples are readily available. In the second step, starting from the pre-trained early layers and the outputs of the first sub-network, we train a quality prediction sub-network using a variant of the stochastic gradient descent method. Different from most deep neural networks, we choose biologically inspired generalized divisive normalization (GDN) instead of rectified linear unit as the activation function. We empirically demonstrate that GDN is effective at reducing model parameters/layers while achieving similar quality prediction performance. With modest model complexity, the proposed MEON index achieves state-of-the-art performance on four publicly available benchmarks. Moreover, we demonstrate the strong competitiveness of MEON against state-of-the-art BIQA models using the group maximum differentiation competition methodology.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".