MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2768354659 · doi:10.1097/ncm.0000000000000268

Respecting Ethical Boundaries to Promote Patient-Centered Care

2017· article· en· W2768354659 on OpenAlexaff
Nina Mottern

Bibliographic record

VenueProfessional Case Management · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicEthics in medical practice
Canadian institutionsNational Capital Commission
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCertificationAccreditationCommissionGovernment (linguistics)Health careBusinessVariety (cybernetics)ManagementNursingPublic relationsPolitical scienceMedical educationMedicineLawComputer scienceFinance

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Nina Mottern, BSN, RN, CCM, is a commissioner with the Commission for Case Manager Certification (CCMC), the first and largest nationally accredited organization that certifies case managers, and also the former chair of the CCMC Ethics and Professional Conduct Committee. With more than 30 years in health care, in a variety of settings in the federal government and private sectors, she is now a geriatric care manager. Address correspondence to Nina Mottern, BSN, RN, CCM, Commission for Case Manager Certification, 1120 Route 73, Ste 200, Mount Laurel, NJ 08054 ([email protected]). The author reports no conflicts of interest.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.011
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.690
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.011
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0200.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0010.007
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.121
GPT teacher head0.524
Teacher spread0.402 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProfessional Case ManagementSame topicEthics in medical practiceFrench-language works237,207