MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2768383108 · doi:10.1139/cjes-2017-0168

The vesicular Sainte-Sophie dykes: a chemically distinct, near-surface facies of the Grenville Dyke Swarm?

2017· article· en· W2768383108 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Michael D. Higgins, Fatim Hankard, Morgan Ganerød, Rob Van der Voo

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Earth Sciences · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological and Geochemical Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Chicoutimi
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeologyPlagioclaseGeochemistryPyroxenePhenocrystOlivineBasaltFaciesIntrusionIgneous rockGeomorphologyPaleontologyVolcanoVolcanic rock

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Undeformed and unmetamorphosed diabase dykes up to 5 m wide occur in an area of ∼100 km2 about 50 km northwest of Montreal near the village of Sainte-Sophie. The dykes are subvertical and oriented east–west. The most common phenocryst phase is plagioclase (1–2 mm, exceptionally 10 mm), followed by olivine, and in one dyke, pyroxene. Most dykes have vesicles 0.1–10 mm in diameter and fine-grained margins. Alteration is extensive: plagioclase is partly sericitized, olivine is serpentinized, and zeolites and carbonate are developed in the vesicles and matrix. Ar–Ar dating was challenging, but the weighted mean of two plateau ages indicates intrusion and cooling at 591.6 ± 2.5 Ma. The overall characteristics of these dykes suggest that they may be a facies of the much larger Grenville dyke swarm to the west. However, there are distinct chemical differences that suggest they were fed from a different, generally more enriched mantle source. This zone may be related to the one that produced the alkaline Monteregian intrusions some 470 million years later in the same region. If the Sainte-Sophie dykes are part of the Grenville dyke event, then the use of chemical fingerprints to identify components of this swarm must be used with caution. Another difference between the Sainte-Sophie and main Grenville dykes is the presence of vesicles and zeolites in the former, which suggests the dykes were emplaced close to the surface; hence, this crustal block has seen little erosion during the last 600 million years.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.796
Threshold uncertainty score0.406

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.196
Teacher spread0.180 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2017
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Earth Sciences→Same topicGeological and Geochemical Analysis→French-language works237,207→